K. Eisen
Impact in
-
- Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
- Neurology top 5%
- Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Papers in
-
- Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies 4
- Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases 1
-
- Health, Medicine and Society 1
- Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues 1
- Co-authors
- D. W. Paty (3 shared papers)A. Dessa Sadovnick (3 shared papers)John P. Hooge (3 shared papers)S. A. Hashimoto (2 shared papers)L. F. Kastrukoff (2 shared papers)Joël Oger (2 shared papers)George C. Ebers (2 shared papers)Andrew Eisen (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Neurology (3 papers)Muscle & Nerve (1 paper)Acta Neurologica Scandinavica (1 paper)Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Canada
In The Last Decade
K. Eisen
6 papers receiving 1.1k citations
K. Eisen's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.0k
- Neurology 392
- Rheumatology 194
- Biological Psychiatry 32
- Psychiatry and Mental health 192
Countries citing papers authored by K. Eisen
This map shows the geographic impact of K. Eisen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. Eisen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. Eisen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by K. Eisen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. Eisen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. Eisen. The network helps show where K. Eisen may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside K. Eisen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MRI in the diagnosis of MS Hit paper breakdown → | 1988 | 504 |
| 2 | 1996 | 409 | |
| 3 | 1991 | 274 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 13 | |
| 5 | 1987 | 8 | |
| 6 | CAUSES OF DEATH IN MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS | 1985 | 2 |
About K. Eisen
K. Eisen is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, General Health Professions, Radiation, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Philosophy, having authored 6 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (4 papers), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (1 paper), Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques (1 paper), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases (1 paper), Health, Medicine and Society (1 paper), Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (1 paper) and Nuclear Physics and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.0k citations), Neurology (392 citations), Rheumatology (194 citations), Biological Psychiatry (32 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (192 citations). K. Eisen has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include D. W. Paty, A. Dessa Sadovnick, John P. Hooge, S. A. Hashimoto, L. F. Kastrukoff, Joël Oger, George C. Ebers, Andrew Eisen, Sherrill Purves and Morton D. Low. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Muscle & Nerve, Acta Neurologica Scandinavica and Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.