K. Charvier

763 citations
38 papers · 485 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

K. Charvier

38 papers receiving 473 citations

Peers

K. Charvier
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 217
  • Urology 82
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 146
  • Rehabilitation 16
  • Reproductive Medicine 19
Replace N Westgren with:
N Westgren Sweden
Peter A. Knapp Switzerland
Andrea L. Nicol United States
Janneke M. Stolwijk-Swüste Netherlands
Meredith M. Hartzell United States
Pauline McNulty United States
Ingrid Hoeritzauer United Kingdom
Joseph Bohlen United States
Inge E. Lamé Netherlands
Donna Massoth United States
K. Charvier relative to N Westgren Sweden N Westgren's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
N Westgren · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by K. Charvier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K. Charvier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. Charvier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. Charvier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K. Charvier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. Charvier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. Charvier. The network helps show where K. Charvier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside K. Charvier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with K. Charvier Line = papers co-authored together K. Charvier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199358
2 200850
3 200743
4 201343
5 199934
6 199527
7 201526
8 201125
9 201219
10 201218
11 201715
12 199814
13 200113
14 201811
15 201111
16 201210
17 20118
18
[Comparative study of the acceptability of the SpeediCath Set and Actreen set catheterization sets in patients performing self-catheterization].
20067
19 20126
20 20136

About K. Charvier

K. Charvier is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Urology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 38 papers that have together received 485 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sexual function and dysfunction studies (11 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (9 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (7 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (3 papers), Urological Disorders and Treatments (3 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers), Male Reproductive Health Studies (2 papers) and Pelvic floor disorders treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (217 citations), Urology (82 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (146 citations), Rehabilitation (16 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (19 citations). K. Charvier has collaborated with scholars based in France, Canada and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Frédérique Courtois, A Leriche, Daniel P. Raymond, Marc Bélanger, Isabelle Côté, Serge Carrier, G. Jacquemin, Pierre A. Guertin, Gilles Rode and A. Ruffion. Their work appears in journals such as Spinal Cord, British Journal of Urology, Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, The Journal of Sexual Medicine and The Journal of Sex Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact