June Chen

24 papers receiving 781 citations

Peers

June Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Ophthalmology 222
  • Pharmacology 163
  • Occupational Therapy 31
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 109
  • Neurology 42
Replace Annamaria Fidilio with:
Annamaria Fidilio Italy
Jan Plátenı́k Czechia
Lisa M. Hernández United States
Derek Van Booven United States
Federica Geraci Italy
Ahmad Cader United States
Akihiro Tobe Japan
Jonas Wittwer Switzerland
Junfang Zhang China
Bei Xu China
June Chen relative to Annamaria Fidilio Italy Annamaria Fidilio's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×31×
Annamaria Fidilio · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by June Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of June Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by June Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites June Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by June Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by June Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by June Chen. The network helps show where June Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside June Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with June Chen Line = papers co-authored together June Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003124
2 200597
3 201190
4 200651
5 201849
6 199346
7 200538
8 200437
9 200237
10 201436
11 200535
12 201830
13 201728
14 201124
15 200024
16 200722
17 199813
18 20099
19 20156
20 20024

About June Chen

June Chen is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Pharmacology, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 809 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (8 papers), Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects (4 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (3 papers), Disability Education and Employment (2 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (2 papers) and Hormonal and reproductive studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (222 citations), Pharmacology (163 citations), Occupational Therapy (31 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (109 citations) and Neurology (42 citations). June Chen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include David F. Woodward, Ming Hu, Huimin Lin, Peter N. Robinson, Geraldine Leader, Larry A. Wheeler, Arlene Mannion, A L Nieves, Elizabeth WoldeMussie and Barbara Feldmann. Their work appears in journals such as Advances in experimental medicine and biology, Experimental Eye Research, Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, Research in autism spectrum disorders and Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact