Julius–Robert Lukas

13 papers receiving 456 citations

Peers

Julius–Robert Lukas
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Neurology 238
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 210
  • Ophthalmology 74
  • Sensory Systems 18
  • Neurology 51
Replace A. Komatsuzaki with:
A. Komatsuzaki Japan
C.-A. Thulin Sweden
H Mühlendyck Germany
M.P.M. ten Tusscher Netherlands
S. Traccis Italy
R. Warwick United Kingdom
Hilary J. Barratt United Kingdom
Fatima Shawkat United Kingdom
Anand C. Joshi United States
A. Mellström Sweden
Julius–Robert Lukas relative to A. Komatsuzaki Japan A. Komatsuzaki's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×21×
A. Komatsuzaki · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julius–Robert Lukas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julius–Robert Lukas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julius–Robert Lukas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julius–Robert Lukas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julius–Robert Lukas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julius–Robert Lukas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julius–Robert Lukas. The network helps show where Julius–Robert Lukas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Julius–Robert Lukas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julius–Robert Lukas Line = papers co-authored together Julius–Robert Lukas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1
Number and distribution of neuromuscular spindles in human extraocular muscles.
199477
2
Innervated myotendinous cylinders in human extraocular muscles.
200064
3
Muscle fiber types of human extraocular muscles: a histochemical and immunohistochemical study.
200061
4 199855
5 200437
6
Fine structural analysis of extraocular muscle spindles of a two-year-old human infant.
199934
7 200831
8 200327
9 200524
10 200123
11 200614
12 199711
13 199711

About Julius–Robert Lukas

Julius–Robert Lukas is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology, Physiology and Molecular Biology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 469 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (5 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (2 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (1 paper), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (1 paper), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (1 paper), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (1 paper) and Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (238 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (210 citations), Ophthalmology (74 citations), Sensory Systems (18 citations) and Neurology (51 citations). Julius–Robert Lukas has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Roland Blumer, Robert Mayr, Martin Aigner, Harald Heinzl, Michaela Denk, Johannes Streicher, Richard Wasicky, Isabella Baumgartner, Kadriye Zeynep Konakci and Michael Blumer. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Experimental Eye Research, The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry and Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact