Julius Scherzer

1.6k citations
19 papers · 916 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Julius Scherzer

19 papers receiving 859 citations

Peers

Julius Scherzer
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Inorganic Chemistry 547
  • Catalysis 202
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 94
  • Analytical Chemistry 103
  • Mechanical Engineering 380
Replace G. Caeiro with:
G. Caeiro Portugal
Alan W. Peters United States
Arthur W. Chester United States
P. Dufresne France
Sachio Asaoka Japan
Thomas F. Degnan United States
R.B. LaPierre United States
R.G. Anthony United States
Jan‐Erik Otterstedt Sweden
E. E. Knyazeva Russia
Julius Scherzer relative to G. Caeiro Portugal G. Caeiro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
G. Caeiro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julius Scherzer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julius Scherzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julius Scherzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julius Scherzer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julius Scherzer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julius Scherzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julius Scherzer. The network helps show where Julius Scherzer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Julius Scherzer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julius Scherzer Line = papers co-authored together Julius Scherzer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 1996260
2 1989190
3 197395
4 199169
5 197865
6 197847
7 197541
8 197739
9 198828
10 197520
11 198120
12 196610
13 19689
14 19839
15 19905
16
Tests show effects of nitrogen compounds on commercial fluid cat cracking catalysts
19863
17 19783
18
Dendromass, raw material of the future - background and first results of the research project DENDROM.
20072
19 19591

About Julius Scherzer

Julius Scherzer is a scholar working on Inorganic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering, Catalysis and Analytical Chemistry, having authored 19 papers that have together received 916 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis (10 papers), Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies (5 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (4 papers), Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis (4 papers), Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions (3 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (2 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (2 papers) and Catalysis for Biomass Conversion (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (547 citations), Catalysis (202 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (94 citations), Analytical Chemistry (103 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (380 citations). Julius Scherzer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan Bass, Leallyn B. Clapp, John O. Edwards, Hubert Jochheim, Bernd Hirschl, Holger Grünewald, Bettina Schneider, Dieter Murach, Ansgar Quinkenstein and Philipp Grundmann. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Catalysis, The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Oil & gas journal, Inorganic Chemistry and Catalysis Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact