Catalysis Reviews

722 papers and 86.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 722 papers published in Catalysis Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 86.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Catalysis Reviews usually cover Materials Chemistry (381 papers), Catalysis (299 papers) and Mechanical Engineering (203 papers) specifically the topics of Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (258 papers), Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions (225 papers) and Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies (179 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Catalysis Reviews are Alessandro Trovarelli, Geoffrey C. Bond, Konstantin Hadjiivanov, M. Albert Vannice, P. Ratnasamy, David S. Newsome, Makoto Misono, Clarence D. Chang, Helmut Knözinger and David T. Thompson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Catalysis Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Catalysis Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Catalysis Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Catalysis Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Catalysis Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Catalysis Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catalysis Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025