Julia Snell

1.8k citations
31 papers · 866 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Julia Snell

30 papers receiving 816 citations

Peers

Julia Snell
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Linguistics and Language 314
  • Language and Linguistics 316
  • Literature and Literary Theory 181
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 183
  • Education 425
Replace Ee Ling Low with:
Ee Ling Low Singapore
Steven Z. Athanases United States
Megan Madigan Peercy United States
Mary M. Juzwik United States
Linda Fisher United Kingdom
Fiona Copland United Kingdom
Yongcan Liu United Kingdom
Jin Sook Lee United States
Joy Kreeft Peyton United States
Catherine Compton‐Lilly United States
Julia Snell relative to Ee Ling Low Singapore Ee Ling Low's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Ee Ling Low · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Snell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Snell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Snell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Snell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Snell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Snell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Snell. The network helps show where Julia Snell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Julia Snell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Snell Line = papers co-authored together Julia Snell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Better than Best Practice: Developing teaching and learning through dialogue
2013151
2 201073
3 201772
4 201369
5 201564
6
Linguistic ethnography : interdisciplinary explorations
201558
7 202246
8 201046
9 201345
10 201142
11 201536
12 201835
13 201019
14 201617
15 201617
16 202212
17 202411
18
Better than best practice : developing teaching and learning through dialogic pedagogy
201410
19 20189
20 20118

About Julia Snell

Julia Snell is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Linguistics and Language, Education, Literature and Literary Theory and Gender Studies, having authored 31 papers that have together received 866 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multilingual Education and Policy (14 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (11 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (10 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (6 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (3 papers), Education and Technology Integration (3 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (2 papers) and Parental Involvement in Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (314 citations), Language and Linguistics (316 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (181 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (183 citations) and Education (425 citations). Julia Snell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Israel and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Adam Lefstein, S. E. Shaw, Fiona Copland, Ian Cushing, Richard Andrews, Aliza Segal and Emma Moore. Their work appears in journals such as Language in Society, Language and Education, British Educational Research Journal, English Today and Literacy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact