Julia Schiffner

772 citations
29 papers · 559 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Julia Schiffner

27 papers receiving 537 citations

Peers

Julia Schiffner
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Reproductive Medicine 113
  • Emergency Medical Services 37
  • Emergency Medicine 24
  • Infectious Diseases 43
  • Artificial Intelligence 86
Replace Brooke Hayward with:
Brooke Hayward United States
Pierre Gillois France
Ruoqing Zhu United States
Ying‐Qi Zhao United States
Martin Seneviratne United States
Rachel Lim United States
Daowen Zhang United States
Agnes Berger United States
Huann‐Sheng Chen United States
Yunus Karaca Türkiye
Julia Schiffner relative to Brooke Hayward United States Brooke Hayward's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12.3×
Brooke Hayward · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Schiffner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Schiffner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Schiffner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Schiffner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Schiffner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Schiffner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Schiffner. The network helps show where Julia Schiffner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Schiffner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Schiffner Line = papers co-authored together Julia Schiffner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013221
2 201594
3 201537
4 201527
5 202125
6 201720
7 202019
8 201318
9 201718
10 201817
11 197716
12 201614
13 20086
14 20195
15 20204
16 20133
17 20182
18 20092
19 20122
20 20132

About Julia Schiffner

Julia Schiffner is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Reproductive Medicine, Signal Processing and Infectious Diseases, having authored 29 papers that have together received 559 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian function and disorders (4 papers), Music and Audio Processing (4 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (3 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (3 papers), Machine Learning and Data Classification (3 papers), Control Systems and Identification (2 papers), Data Mining Algorithms and Applications (2 papers) and Face and Expression Recognition (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (113 citations), Emergency Medical Services (37 citations), Emergency Medicine (24 citations), Infectious Diseases (43 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (86 citations). Julia Schiffner has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bernd Bischl, Michel Lang, Zachary Jones, Jakob Richter, Lars Kotthoff, Giuseppe Casalicchio, Sarah Johnson, Christian Gnoth, Erhard Godehardt and Günter Freundl. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Public Health, The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, Journal of Machine Learning Research, Fertility and Sterility and Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact