Julia Riedel

2.3k citations
43 papers · 1.3k · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Julia Riedel

37 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Julia Riedel
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Developmental Biology 132
  • Pharmacy 151
  • Small Animals 239
  • Genetics 621
  • Social Psychology 467
Replace Nicole R. Dorey with:
Nicole R. Dorey United States
Anna Scandurra Italy
Lieta Marinelli Italy
Emanuela Prato‐Previde Italy
Emily E. Bray United States
Paolo Mongillo Italy
Christian Nawroth Germany
Kenth Svartberg Sweden
Judit Vas Norway
Augusto Vitale Italy
Julia Riedel relative to Nicole R. Dorey United States Nicole R. Dorey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Nicole R. Dorey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Riedel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Riedel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Riedel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Riedel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Riedel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Riedel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Riedel. The network helps show where Julia Riedel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Riedel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Riedel Line = papers co-authored together Julia Riedel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006299
2 2004262
3 2007187
4 201380
5 201362
6 200158
7 202043
8 200543
9 201836
10 201732
11 201826
12 201025
13 201924
14 201023
15 202110
16 200110
17 20239
18 20209
19 20128
20 20228

About Julia Riedel

Julia Riedel is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Plant Science, Social Psychology, Small Animals and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (19 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (8 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (5 papers), Agriculture and Biological Studies (5 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (4 papers), Livestock and Poultry Management (4 papers), Moringa oleifera research and applications (4 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (132 citations), Pharmacy (151 citations), Small Animals (239 citations), Genetics (621 citations) and Social Psychology (467 citations). Julia Riedel has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, Germany and India. Frequent co-authors include Michael Tomasello, Josep Call, Juliane Kaminski, Juliane Bräuer, Christophe Boesch, Krzysztof Damaziak, Rudolf Tischner, Gisela Mäck, J. Niemiec and Dariusz Gozdowskı. Their work appears in journals such as Poultry Science, The Journal of Applied Poultry Research, Annals of Animal Science, Animal Behaviour and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact