Emily E. Bray

2.1k citations
22 papers · 685 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

    • Human-Animal Interaction Studies 19
    • Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior 8
    • Primate Behavior and Ecology 2

Emily E. Bray

20 papers receiving 670 citations

Peers

Emily E. Bray
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Small Animals 243
  • Pharmacy 92
  • Genetics 542
  • Developmental Biology 39
  • Social Psychology 296
Replace Judit Vas with:
Judit Vas Norway
Gabriela Barrera Argentina
C. Passalacqua Italy
Lisa Wallis Hungary
I. Merola Italy
Paolo Mongillo Italy
Charlotte Duranton France
Borbála Turcsán Hungary
Carine Savalli Brazil
Natalia Albuquerque Brazil
Emily E. Bray relative to Judit Vas Norway Judit Vas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Judit Vas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily E. Bray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily E. Bray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily E. Bray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily E. Bray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily E. Bray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily E. Bray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily E. Bray. The network helps show where Emily E. Bray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily E. Bray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily E. Bray Line = papers co-authored together Emily E. Bray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013123
2 202176
3 201772
4 201569
5 202050
6 201744
7 201941
8 202140
9 202137
10 202034
11 201730
12 202126
13 202314
14 202312
15 20217
16
Evidence for win-stay-lose-shift in puppies and adult dogs.
20203
17 20253
18 20242
19 20241
20
Ontogeny and Heritability of Cognitive and Behavioral Traits Linked to Success as a Military Working Dog
20191

About Emily E. Bray

Emily E. Bray is a scholar working on Genetics, Social Psychology, Pharmacy, Small Animals and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 685 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Animal Interaction Studies (19 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (8 papers), Infant Health and Development (5 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (4 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (2 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (2 papers) and Child and Animal Learning Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (243 citations), Pharmacy (92 citations), Genetics (542 citations), Developmental Biology (39 citations) and Social Psychology (296 citations). Emily E. Bray has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Evan L. MacLean, Brian Hare, James A. Serpell, Mary D. Sammel, Robert M. Seyfarth, Dorothy L. Cheney, Brenda S. Kennedy, Kerinne Levy, Daniel J. Horschler and Gitanjali E. Gnanadesikan. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Veterinary Science, Animal Cognition, Current Biology, Animal Behaviour and Frontiers in Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact