Julia Remmers

1.1k citations
11 papers · 171 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Julia Remmers

10 papers receiving 169 citations

Peers

Julia Remmers
Comparison fields: 5 of 15
  • Atmospheric Science 153
  • Global and Planetary Change 138
  • Environmental Engineering 49
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 22
  • Spectroscopy 12
Replace Debra E. Kollonige with:
Debra E. Kollonige United States
Athina Argyrouli Greece
Caroline Fayt Belgium
Moritz Müller Austria
Alexander Borovski Russia
F. Scolas Belgium
C. Senten Belgium
Johan Strandgren Germany
T. Yang China
Hyeong‐Ahn Kwon South Korea
Julia Remmers relative to Debra E. Kollonige United States Debra E. Kollonige's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Debra E. Kollonige · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Remmers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Remmers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Remmers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Remmers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Remmers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Remmers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Remmers. The network helps show where Julia Remmers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Remmers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Remmers Line = papers co-authored together Julia Remmers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 201456
2 201635
3 201930
4 201528
5 201710
6 20155
7 20213
8 20202
9 20151
10 20141
11
Azimuthal variability of trace gases and aerosols measured during the MADCAT campaign in summer 2013 in Mainz, Germany
20150

About Julia Remmers

Julia Remmers is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Aerospace Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 11 papers that have together received 171 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (8 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (8 papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (7 papers), Atmospheric aerosols and clouds (5 papers), Calibration and Measurement Techniques (2 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (1 paper), Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting (1 paper) and Air Quality and Health Impacts (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (153 citations), Global and Planetary Change (138 citations), Environmental Engineering (49 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (22 citations) and Spectroscopy (12 citations). Julia Remmers has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and China. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Wagner, Steffen Beirle, Yang Wang, Steffen Dörner, Reza Shaiganfar, Arnoud Apituley, Udo Frieß, Sebastian Donner, Marloes Penning de Vries and Pinhua Xie. Their work appears in journals such as Atmospheric measurement techniques and EGUGA.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact