Julia Offermann

33 papers receiving 305 citations

Peers

Julia Offermann
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 10
  • Demography 84
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 43
  • Sociology and Political Science 111
  • Applied Psychology 10
Replace Jung–hye Shin with:
Jung–hye Shin United States
Alison Kenner United States
Phillippa Carnemolla Australia
Sébastien Lord Canada
Sanghoon Lee South Korea
Bernardo Tabuenca Spain
Ryan McAndrew Australia
Jimmy Armoogum France
Francisco J. Gutiérrez Chile
Fariya Sharmeen Netherlands
Julia Offermann relative to Jung–hye Shin United States Jung–hye Shin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Jung–hye Shin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Offermann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Offermann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Offermann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Offermann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Offermann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Offermann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Offermann. The network helps show where Julia Offermann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Julia Offermann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Offermann Line = papers co-authored together Julia Offermann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201841
2 202038
3 201932
4 201926
5 201819
6 202118
7 202117
8 201815
9 202112
10 20228
11 20247
12 20217
13 20207
14
Die Wirtschaftsethik der Weltreligionen : das antike Judentum : Schriften und Reden 1911-1920
20086
15 20236
16 20226
17 20226
18 20225
19 20184
20 20234

About Julia Offermann

Julia Offermann is a scholar working on Demography, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 37 papers that have together received 310 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Technology Use by Older Adults (10 papers), Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy (8 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (7 papers), Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (6 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (5 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (4 papers), Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure (3 papers) and Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (10 citations), Demography (84 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (43 citations), Sociology and Political Science (111 citations) and Applied Psychology (10 citations). Julia Offermann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Italy and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Martina Ziefle, Wiktoria Wilkowska, Katrin Arning, Eva-Maria Schomakers, Anika Linzenich, André Sternberg, André Bardow, Francisco Flórez‐Revuelta, Thea Laurentius and Leo Cornelius Bollheimer. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Public Health, Sensors, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, International Journal of Medical Informatics and Frontiers in Energy Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact