Julia Moore

33 papers receiving 565 citations

Peers

Julia Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Gender Studies 177
  • Communication 70
  • Social Psychology 121
  • Demography 69
  • Clinical Psychology 99
Replace Kirsten Weber with:
Kirsten Weber United States
Joanne Brown United Kingdom
May Friedman Canada
John Wilson United States
Nader Ahmadi Sweden
Sarah Seymour‐Smith United Kingdom
Rhonda A. Richardson United States
Lydia P. Buki United States
Charee M. Thompson United States
Judith L. M. McCoyd United States
Julia Moore relative to Kirsten Weber United States Kirsten Weber's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.0×
Kirsten Weber · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Moore. The network helps show where Julia Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Moore Line = papers co-authored together Julia Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200280
2 201868
3 201850
4 201441
5 201941
6 201639
7 201434
8 201734
9 198828
10 201621
11 201820
12
The Light and Shadow of Feminist Research Mentorship: A Collaborative Autoethnography of Faculty-Student Research
201319
13 201619
14 201716
15 202211
16 202010
17 201310
18
Awareness during bronchoscopy.
19878
19 20157
20 20177

About Julia Moore

Julia Moore is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Philosophy and Demography, having authored 33 papers that have together received 609 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (8 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (8 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (5 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (5 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (3 papers), Nausea and vomiting management (3 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (3 papers) and Communication in Education and Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (177 citations), Communication (70 citations), Social Psychology (121 citations), Demography (69 citations) and Clinical Psychology (99 citations). Julia Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jenna S. Abetz, Jimmie Manning, Dawn O. Braithwaite, Rachel Elliott, Katherine Payne, Austen Peter Moore, Linda Davies, N.J.N. Harper, Gavin Thoms and E. W. Moore. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Family Communication, Women s Studies in Communication, Western Journal of Communication, Journal of Marriage and the Family and Journal of Clinical Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact