Julia M. Smith

646 citations
7 papers · 516 · h-index 6

Impact in

    • Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
    • Child Abuse and Trauma

Papers in

Julia M. Smith

7 papers receiving 469 citations

Peers

Julia M. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Family Practice 53
  • Clinical Psychology 253
  • Safety Research 54
  • Health 53
  • Education 154
Replace Ellen Katz with:
Ellen Katz Canada
Khalid Karim United Kingdom
Ana Salgueira Portugal
Brian P. Cole United States
Hannah B. Bayne United States
Jeffrey M. Ring United States
David W. Cline United States
Woo Taek Jeon South Korea
A. Hallam United Kingdom
Agnes G. Rezler United States
Julia M. Smith relative to Ellen Katz Canada Ellen Katz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Ellen Katz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia M. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia M. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia M. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia M. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia M. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia M. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia M. Smith. The network helps show where Julia M. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Julia M. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia M. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Julia M. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 2002281
2 1993154
3 200037
4 202016
5 202315
6 202211
7 20242

About Julia M. Smith

Julia M. Smith is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Social Psychology and Family Practice, having authored 7 papers that have together received 516 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (3 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (1 paper), Cultural Differences and Values (1 paper), Emotions and Moral Behavior (1 paper), Child Abuse and Trauma (1 paper), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper) and Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (53 citations), Clinical Psychology (253 citations), Safety Research (54 citations), Health (53 citations) and Education (154 citations). Julia M. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Vonnie C. McLoyd, Judith G. Calhoun, James O. Woolliscroft, Jonathan A. Finkelstein, Sandra L. Hofferth, Allon Vishkin, Jeremy Ginges, Michael H. Pasek, Kathryn A. Johnson and Cindel White. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Social Issues, Academic Medicine, Journal of Marriage and the Family, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and Psychological Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact