Julia Lorke

10 papers receiving 214 citations

Peers

Julia Lorke
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Ecological Modeling 97
  • Social Psychology 72
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 19
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 29
  • Computer Science Applications 12
Replace Andy Ruck with:
Andy Ruck United Kingdom
Emily Harris United States
Alison Dyke United Kingdom
Μαρία Δασκολιά Greece
Celia Evans United States
Laure Kloetzer‬ Switzerland
B. Troy Frensley United States
Kaberi Kar Gupta United States
Till Bruckermann Germany
Maria da Glória Arrais Peter United States
Julia Lorke relative to Andy Ruck United Kingdom Andy Ruck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Andy Ruck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Lorke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Lorke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Lorke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Lorke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Lorke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Lorke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Lorke. The network helps show where Julia Lorke may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Lorke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Lorke Line = papers co-authored together Julia Lorke links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2020155
2 202218
3 202116
4 202214
5 202010
6
Training needs and recommendations for Citizen Science participants, facilitators and designers
20199
7
Learning Opportunities and Outcomes in Citizen Science: A Heuristic Model for Design and Evaluation
20205
8 20222
9 20241
10 20251
11 20260

About Julia Lorke

Julia Lorke is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Molecular Biology and Education, having authored 11 papers that have together received 231 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Species Distribution and Climate Change (8 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (6 papers), Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research (2 papers), Service-Learning and Community Engagement (2 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (2 papers), Innovative Education and Learning Practices (1 paper), Participatory Visual Research Methods (1 paper) and Museums and Cultural Heritage (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (97 citations), Social Psychology (72 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (19 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (29 citations) and Computer Science Applications (12 citations). Julia Lorke has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Joseph Roche, Andy Ruck, Cecília Galvão, Laure Kloetzer‬, Mari Laakso, Greg Mannion, Laura Bell, Yaela N. Golumbic, Alice L. Mauchline and Kai Pata. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Sociology, Environmental Education Research, Frontiers in Environmental Science, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education and Public Understanding of Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact