Julia Lobera

38 papers receiving 319 citations

Peers

Julia Lobera
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 9
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 129
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 191
  • Media Technology 51
  • Computational Mechanics 105
Replace Jingtao Dong with:
Jingtao Dong China
Carl C. Aleksoff United States
Toshitaka Wakayama Japan
Ruipeng Guo China
Shouqian Chen China
Holger Venzke Germany
Antonı́n Mikš Czechia
Yunfeng Nie Belgium
J. Czarske Germany
Julia Lobera relative to Jingtao Dong China Jingtao Dong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Jingtao Dong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Lobera

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Lobera's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Lobera with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Lobera more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Lobera

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Lobera. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Lobera. The network helps show where Julia Lobera may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Julia Lobera, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Lobera Line = papers co-authored together Julia Lobera links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200857
2 200929
3 200521
4 200421
5 201019
6 202017
7 200814
8 201413
9 200812
10 200811
11 200811
12 200511
13 201110
14 20208
15 20237
16 20037
17 20196
18 20136
19 20006
20
Multi-camera digital holographic imaging PIV versus tomographic imaging PIV - comparison and contrast of these two 3C-3D PIV techniques
20076

About Julia Lobera

Julia Lobera is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computational Mechanics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Biomedical Engineering and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 41 papers that have together received 337 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Holography and Microscopy (25 papers), Optical measurement and interference techniques (12 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (10 papers), Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography (5 papers), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (5 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (5 papers), Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements (4 papers) and Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Acoustics and Ultrasonics (9 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (129 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (191 citations), Media Technology (51 citations) and Computational Mechanics (105 citations). Julia Lobera has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Jeremy Coupland, M. P. Arroyo, L.A. Angurel, Ana María López, Jordi Pallarès, Youssef Stiriba, N. A. Halliwell, Francisco José Torcal-Milla, Callum Atkinson and I. García. Their work appears in journals such as Measurement Science and Technology, Experiments in Fluids, Optics and Lasers in Engineering, Optics Letters and Optics & Laser Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact