Julia Kish‐Doto

20 papers receiving 419 citations

Peers

Julia Kish‐Doto
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 82
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 116
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 116
  • Rheumatology 57
  • Otorhinolaryngology 16
Replace Sabina de Weerd with:
Sabina de Weerd Netherlands
Nicole Roberts Canada
Carl Michael Baravelli Norway
Monika Asnani Jamaica
Atsuko Koyama Japan
Zahra Tavoli Iran
Lene Seibæk Denmark
Barbara Potrata United Kingdom
Sage Bolte United States
Ting Guan United States
Julia Kish‐Doto relative to Sabina de Weerd Netherlands Sabina de Weerd's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Sabina de Weerd · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Kish‐Doto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Kish‐Doto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Kish‐Doto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Kish‐Doto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Kish‐Doto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Kish‐Doto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Kish‐Doto. The network helps show where Julia Kish‐Doto may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Kish‐Doto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Kish‐Doto Line = papers co-authored together Julia Kish‐Doto links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017111
2 201653
3 201544
4 201335
5 201731
6 201327
7 201124
8 201622
9 201419
10 201417
11 201011
12 201711
13 20086
14 20095
15 20144
16 20194
17 20182
18
RUprego? The role of social media to educate young women about low intervention childbirth:
20101
19 20181
20 20221

About Julia Kish‐Doto

Julia Kish‐Doto is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 21 papers that have together received 429 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (3 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (3 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (2 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (2 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (2 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers) and Folate and B Vitamins Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (82 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (116 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (116 citations), Rheumatology (57 citations) and Otorhinolaryngology (16 citations). Julia Kish‐Doto has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Katherine Treiman, Jennifer Cook Middleton, Wanda K. Nicholson, Emmanuel Coker‐Schwimmer, Denise M. Levis, Molly Lynch, Megan A. Lewis, Elizabeth W. Mitchell, Brian G. Southwell and Amber Köblitz. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Health Promotion, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, Disability and health journal, JAMA and BMC Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact