Julia Hallam

539 citations
18 papers · 244 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Julia Hallam

17 papers receiving 207 citations

Peers

Julia Hallam
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Research and Theory 20
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 24
  • Leadership and Management 8
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 23
  • Gender Studies 41
Replace Jane Dawson with:
Jane Dawson United Kingdom
Gwyn Harries‐Jenkins United Kingdom
Jenna Ward United Kingdom
Matt Rogers Canada
Goldie Osuri Slovenia
David W. Lloyd United States
Gillian Robinson United States
Avril Bell New Zealand
Jean Waltman United States
Meenakshi Thapan India
Julia Hallam relative to Jane Dawson United Kingdom Jane Dawson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Jane Dawson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Hallam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Hallam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Hallam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Hallam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Hallam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Hallam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Hallam. The network helps show where Julia Hallam may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Julia Hallam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Hallam Line = papers co-authored together Julia Hallam links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1
Nursing the Image: Media, Culture and Professional Identity
200055
2
Realism and popular cinema
200044
3 199838
4
Locating the Moving Image: New Approaches to Film and Place
201324
5 200219
6 201210
7 20109
8 20078
9
Grey's Anatomy: scalpels, sex and stereotypes.
20098
10 20117
11 19955
12 20135
13 20073
14 20123
15
Questioning the 'ordinary'woman: Oranges are not the Only Fruit, text and viewer
19952
16 20172
17
Transient glamour: the filmic representation of airports and its relation to real life architectural developments.
20081
18 20091

About Julia Hallam

Julia Hallam is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Urban Studies and Gender Studies, having authored 18 papers that have together received 244 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cinema and Media Studies (6 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (4 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (3 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (3 papers), Art History and Market Analysis (2 papers), Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (2 papers), Irish and British Studies (2 papers) and Media Studies and Communication (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (20 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (24 citations), Leadership and Management (8 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (23 citations) and Gender Studies (41 citations). Julia Hallam has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Margaret Marshment, Judith Parker, Les Roberts and Robert Kronenburg. Their work appears in journals such as Screen, Journal of British Cinema and Television, Critical Studies in Television The International Journal of Television Studies, New Review of Film and Television Studies and European Journal of Cultural Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact