Julia Erb
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
- Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Sensory Systems top 10%
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Papers in
-
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation 10
- Neuroscience and Music Perception 8
- Neural dynamics and brain function 3
-
- Noise Effects and Management 2
- Co-authors
- Jonas Obleser (10 shared papers)Molly J. Henry (3 shared papers)Frank Eisner (2 shared papers)Gesa Hartwigsen (2 shared papers)Sarah Tune (2 shared papers)Jens Kreitewolf (2 shared papers)Marcelo Armendáriz (1 shared paper)Wim Vanduffel (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Neuropsychologia (2 papers)Cerebral Cortex (1 paper)Ear and Hearing (1 paper)Journal of Neuroscience (1 paper)Science Advances (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyNetherlandsBelgium
In The Last Decade
Julia Erb
13 papers receiving 348 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Cognitive Neuroscience 332
- Sensory Systems 52
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 120
- Speech and Hearing 51
- Signal Processing 37
Countries citing papers authored by Julia Erb
This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Erb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Erb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Erb more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Erb
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Erb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Erb. The network helps show where Julia Erb may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 22 scholars most cited alongside Julia Erb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 122 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 97 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 47 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 24 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 17 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1998 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 13 | The neural dynamics of perceptual adaptation to degraded speech | 2014 | 1 |
About Julia Erb
Julia Erb is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Speech and Hearing, Artificial Intelligence, Sensory Systems and Social Psychology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 359 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (10 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (8 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers), Noise Effects and Management (2 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (2 papers), Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (1 paper), Speech and Audio Processing (1 paper) and Natural Language Processing Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (332 citations), Sensory Systems (52 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (120 citations), Speech and Hearing (51 citations) and Signal Processing (37 citations). Julia Erb has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Jonas Obleser, Molly J. Henry, Frank Eisner, Gesa Hartwigsen, Sarah Tune, Jens Kreitewolf, Marcelo Armendáriz, Wim Vanduffel, Elia Formisano and Federico De Martino. Their work appears in journals such as Neuropsychologia, Cerebral Cortex, Ear and Hearing, Journal of Neuroscience and Science Advances.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.