Julia Day

939 citations
12 papers · 718 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Julia Day

12 papers receiving 649 citations

Peers

Julia Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Sensory Systems 144
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 262
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 328
  • Language and Linguistics 136
  • Literature and Literary Theory 89
Replace Merle Mahon with:
Merle Mahon United Kingdom
Annie Magnan France
Taina Välimaa Finland
Barbara Peterson United States
Kristina Hansson Sweden
Raúl Rojas United States
Nancy Benson Canada
Nathalie Giroud Switzerland
Pasquale Rinaldi Italy
Rory A. DePaolis United States
Julia Day relative to Merle Mahon United Kingdom Merle Mahon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.4×
Merle Mahon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Day. The network helps show where Julia Day may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Julia Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Day Line = papers co-authored together Julia Day links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2013230
2 1992145
3 201087
4 201366
5 201345
6 200942
7 201431
8 201223
9 201416
10 200814
11 201313
12 19726

About Julia Day

Julia Day is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Sensory Systems, Human Factors and Ergonomics and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 718 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (7 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (5 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (5 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers), Language Development and Disorders (1 paper), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (1 paper), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (1 paper) and Digital Accessibility for Disabilities (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (144 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (262 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (328 citations), Language and Linguistics (136 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (89 citations). Julia Day has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Teresa Y. C. Ching, R. C. Gardner, Kathryn Crowe, Mark Seeto, Linda Cupples, Harvey Dillon, Sanna Hou, Laura Street, Vicky Zhang and Christopher Flynn. Their work appears in journals such as Cochlear Implants International, International Journal of Audiology, British Journal of Educational Psychology, International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Reading Research Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact