John Makeham

1.2k citations
68 papers · 568 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

John Makeham

52 papers receiving 420 citations

Peers

John Makeham
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Sociology and Political Science 412
  • Philosophy 60
  • Religious studies 25
  • Linguistics and Language 14
  • Archeology 29
Replace Nur Masalha with:
Nur Masalha United Kingdom
Ernest Renan Canada
David Shepherd Nivison United States
Walid Khalidi United States
Israel Gershoni Israel
Paschalis Michael Kitromilides Greece
Arie L. Molendijk Netherlands
Steven J. Zipperstein United States
Nicolás Bancel France
Jehuda Reinharz United States
John Makeham relative to Nur Masalha United Kingdom Nur Masalha's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Nur Masalha · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Makeham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Makeham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Makeham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Makeham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Makeham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Makeham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Makeham. The network helps show where John Makeham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside John Makeham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Makeham Line = papers co-authored together John Makeham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199551
2
Transmitters and Creators: Chinese Commentators and Commentaries on the Analects
200348
3 200439
4
Lost Soul: "Confucianism" in Contemporary Chinese Academic Discourse
200832
5 201031
6 200327
7 199426
8 200526
9 200825
10
Cultural, ethnic, and political nationalism in contemporary Taiwan : bentuhua
200523
11 199622
12 200322
13 199520
14
Contemporary Chinese Thought
200517
15
Thinking with Cases: Specialist Knowledge in Chinese Cultural History
200914
16 200813
17
Learning to Emulate the Wise: The Genesis of Chinese Philosophy as an Academic Discipline in Twentieth-Century China
201212
18 199811
19 200311
20 201110

About John Makeham

John Makeham is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Religious studies, Philosophy, Cultural Studies and History, having authored 68 papers that have together received 568 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (52 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (9 papers), Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (6 papers), Japanese History and Culture (2 papers), Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books (2 papers), Landscape and Cultural Studies (1 paper), Classical Studies and Philology (1 paper) and Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (412 citations), Philosophy (60 citations), Religious studies (25 citations), Linguistics and Language (14 citations) and Archeology (29 citations). John Makeham has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Stephen C. Angle and Barry Oliver. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy East and West, Sophia, The China Journal, Monumenta Serica and Asian Studies Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact