Julia Chen‐Sankey

77 papers receiving 980 citations

Peers

Julia Chen‐Sankey
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Physiology 715
  • Applied Psychology 72
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 46
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 86
  • Pharmacology 49
Replace Kymberle L. Sterling with:
Kymberle L. Sterling United States
Shari P. Feirman United States
Stephanie L. Clendennen United States
Kathleen R. Case United States
Haneen Abudayyeh United States
Yue-Lin Zhuang United States
Kathryn C. Edwards United States
Shanna Cox United States
Eric N. Lindblom United States
Lauren Kass Lempert United States
Julia Chen‐Sankey relative to Kymberle L. Sterling United States Kymberle L. Sterling's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Kymberle L. Sterling · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Chen‐Sankey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Chen‐Sankey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Chen‐Sankey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Chen‐Sankey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Chen‐Sankey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Chen‐Sankey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Chen‐Sankey. The network helps show where Julia Chen‐Sankey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Chen‐Sankey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Chen‐Sankey Line = papers co-authored together Julia Chen‐Sankey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201980
2 201852
3 202048
4 201846
5 202041
6 202141
7 201836
8 201935
9 201634
10 201832
11 202228
12 202126
13 201926
14 202224
15 202323
16 201923
17 201821
18 202120
19 202019
20 201819

About Julia Chen‐Sankey

Julia Chen‐Sankey is a scholar working on Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Applied Psychology, Pharmacology and General Health Professions, having authored 86 papers that have together received 993 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (66 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (7 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (6 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (6 papers), Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (3 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (3 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (2 papers) and Risk Perception and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (715 citations), Applied Psychology (72 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (46 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (86 citations) and Pharmacology (49 citations). Julia Chen‐Sankey has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Kelvin Choi, Dina L. G. Borzekowski, Erin L. Mead, Jennifer B. Unger, Kerry M. Green, Meghan Bridgid Moran, Edward M. Bernat, Maansi Bansal‐Travers, Jeff Niederdeppe and Cristine D. Delnevo. Their work appears in journals such as Nicotine & Tobacco Research, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Substance Use & Misuse, Tobacco Control and Addictive Behaviors.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact