Julia C. Shaw

430 citations
24 papers · 324 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Julia C. Shaw

24 papers receiving 323 citations

Peers

Julia C. Shaw
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 78
  • Developmental Neuroscience 59
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 160
  • Biological Psychiatry 12
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 16
Replace Eveline Strackx with:
Eveline Strackx Netherlands
Béla Veszprémi Hungary
M. Fadalti Italy
Juan C. Velasquez United States
Sharonda Harris United States
Agneta Gunnar Sweden
Deborah Bowlby United States
Altankhuu Tungalagsuvd Japan
Munkhsaikhan Munkhzaya Japan
Ying Sze United Kingdom
Julia C. Shaw relative to Eveline Strackx Netherlands Eveline Strackx's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.6×
Eveline Strackx · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia C. Shaw

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia C. Shaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia C. Shaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia C. Shaw more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia C. Shaw

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia C. Shaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia C. Shaw. The network helps show where Julia C. Shaw may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Julia C. Shaw, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia C. Shaw Line = papers co-authored together Julia C. Shaw links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201536
2 201532
3 201531
4 201927
5 202025
6 201824
7 201623
8 201719
9 201916
10 202115
11 201813
12 201713
13 20219
14 20229
15 20238
16 20245
17 20244
18 20224
19 20173
20 20242

About Julia C. Shaw

Julia C. Shaw is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Developmental Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience, Epidemiology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 24 papers that have together received 324 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (11 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (8 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (6 papers), Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis (6 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (6 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (5 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (3 papers) and Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (78 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (59 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (160 citations), Biological Psychiatry (12 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (16 citations). Julia C. Shaw has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hannah K. Palliser, Jonathan J. Hirst, David W. Walker, Mary J. Berry, Rebecca M. Dyson, Deborah M. Hodgson, Tamás Zakár, Clint Gray, Meredith A. Kelleher and Kerrin Palazzi. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Physiology, Psychoneuroendocrinology, Pediatric Research, Developmental Neuroscience and Frontiers in Pediatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact