Julia Bailey

3.1k citations
86 papers · 2.0k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Julia Bailey

81 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Julia Bailey
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • General Health Professions 1.1k
  • Applied Psychology 180
  • Microbiology 192
  • Infectious Diseases 404
  • Clinical Psychology 322
Replace Rebecca French with:
Rebecca French United Kingdom
Bradley O. Boekeloo United States
Susan Rogers United States
Devon J. Hensel United States
Andrew Phelps United Kingdom
Judy Gold Australia
Philip Prah United Kingdom
S. Marie Harvey United States
Mary McFarlane United States
Alexandra M. Minnis United States
Julia Bailey relative to Rebecca French United Kingdom Rebecca French's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Rebecca French · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Bailey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Bailey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Bailey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Bailey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Bailey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Bailey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Bailey. The network helps show where Julia Bailey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Bailey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Bailey Line = papers co-authored together Julia Bailey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002157
2 2010140
3 2007106
4 2004104
5 2003104
6 2015100
7 202090
8 200471
9 200971
10 202262
11 200458
12 201255
13 201254
14
Lesbians and cervical screening.
200051
15 201647
16 201345
17 201537
18 202130
19 201930
20 202130

About Julia Bailey

Julia Bailey is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Infectious Diseases, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Applied Psychology, having authored 86 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (57 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (20 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (18 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (14 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (10 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (10 papers), Reproductive tract infections research (8 papers) and Global Maternal and Child Health (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (1.1k citations), Applied Psychology (180 citations), Microbiology (192 citations), Infectious Diseases (404 citations) and Clinical Psychology (322 citations). Julia Bailey has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth Murray, Catherine H Mercer, Nathan Davies, Samah Alageel, Greta Rait, Charlie Owen, Caroline Free, S. E. Shaw, Irwin Nazareth and Gene Feder. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Sexually Transmitted Infections, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Health Technology Assessment and Digital Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact