Julia Bailey

3.3k citations
90 papers · 2.3k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Julia Bailey

86 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Julia Bailey
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Microbiology 206
  • General Health Professions 717
  • Applied Psychology 101
  • Infectious Diseases 241
  • Gender Studies 118
Replace Bradley O. Boekeloo with:
Bradley O. Boekeloo United States
Andrew Phelps United Kingdom
Philip Prah United Kingdom
Devon Hensel United States
S. Marie Harvey United States
Jennifer G. Clarke United States
Mary A. Ott United States
Maria Trent United States
Melanie A. Gold United States
Judy Gold Australia
Julia Bailey relative to Bradley O. Boekeloo United States Bradley O. Boekeloo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.2×
Bradley O. Boekeloo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Bailey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Bailey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Bailey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Bailey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Bailey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Bailey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Bailey. The network helps show where Julia Bailey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Bailey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Bailey Line = papers co-authored together Julia Bailey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 90 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002170
2 2010150
3 2007114
4 2003111
5 2020110
6 2015108
7 2004107
8 202289
9 200978
10 200474
11 200464
12 201258
13
Lesbians and cervical screening.
200055
14 201254
15 201351
16 201650
17 201545
18 202137
19 202135
20 202333

About Julia Bailey

Julia Bailey is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Microbiology, Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 90 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (24 papers), Reproductive tract infections research (10 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (7 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (6 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (6 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (5 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (4 papers) and Sexual function and dysfunction studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (206 citations), General Health Professions (717 citations), Applied Psychology (101 citations), Infectious Diseases (241 citations) and Gender Studies (118 citations). Julia Bailey has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth M. Murray, Nathan Davies, Samah Alageel, Noura Alomair, Catherine Heather Mercer, Greta Rait, Caroline Free, Sara Elizabeth Shaw, Charlie Owen and Irwin Nazareth. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Sexually Transmitted Infections, Digital Health and Health Technology Assessment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact