Jui‐Chen Tsai

2.7k citations
44 papers · 2.0k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Jui‐Chen Tsai

43 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Jui‐Chen Tsai
Comparison fields: 5 of 165
  • Pharmaceutical Science 178
  • Dermatology 131
  • Pollution 175
  • Biomaterials 189
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 179
Replace Miranda C. E. Lomer with:
Miranda C. E. Lomer United Kingdom
Éric Houdeau France
Nádia Rezende Barbosa Raposo Brazil
Yoko Sato Japan
Xin Rui Xia China
Francesca Larese Filon Italy
Xiaoling Li China
Min-Hee Kang South Korea
Peter John Cabot Australia
Daniela T Vecchio Italy
Jui‐Chen Tsai relative to Miranda C. E. Lomer United Kingdom Miranda C. E. Lomer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.6×
Miranda C. E. Lomer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jui‐Chen Tsai

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jui‐Chen Tsai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jui‐Chen Tsai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jui‐Chen Tsai more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jui‐Chen Tsai

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jui‐Chen Tsai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jui‐Chen Tsai. The network helps show where Jui‐Chen Tsai may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jui‐Chen Tsai, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jui‐Chen Tsai Line = papers co-authored together Jui‐Chen Tsai links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014294
2 2016230
3 2014214
4 2014145
5 2017111
6 2017111
7 201685
8 200380
9 200177
10 201560
11 201854
12 201448
13 199944
14 200538
15 202138
16 200437
17 201137
18 200329
19 201628
20 201128

About Jui‐Chen Tsai

Jui‐Chen Tsai is a scholar working on Pharmaceutical Science, Dermatology, Food Science, Psychiatry and Mental health and Epidemiology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery (11 papers), Dermatology and Skin Diseases (6 papers), Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (5 papers), Autophagy in Disease and Therapy (4 papers), Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (3 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (2 papers) and Microencapsulation and Drying Processes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (178 citations), Dermatology (131 citations), Pollution (175 citations), Biomaterials (189 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (179 citations). Jui‐Chen Tsai has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Ying‐Jan Wang, Chun-Wan Chen, Yu‐Hsuan Lee, Hui‐Wen Chiu, Kuei‐Ru Chou, Hamm‐Ming Sheu, Hsin Chu, Yu‐Li Lo, Bin-Hsu Mao and Shian-Jang Yan. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Dermatological Science, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, Biomaterials and Applied Nursing Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact