Chia‐Ming Chang

234 papers receiving 5.6k citations

Peers

Chia‐Ming Chang
Comparison fields: 5 of 196
  • Molecular Medicine 691
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 164
  • Endocrinology 391
  • Information Systems and Management 501
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 170
Replace Daniel E Jonas with:
Daniel E Jonas United States
Jayawant N. Mandrekar United States
Walter Ricciardi Italy
Igor Rudan United Kingdom
Wei Li China
Lorenzo Moja Italy
Michael Boyle United States
Andrew Hayward United Kingdom
Nicholas Graves Australia
Christophe Combescure Switzerland
Chia‐Ming Chang relative to Daniel E Jonas United States Daniel E Jonas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15.7×
Daniel E Jonas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chia‐Ming Chang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chia‐Ming Chang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chia‐Ming Chang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chia‐Ming Chang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chia‐Ming Chang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chia‐Ming Chang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chia‐Ming Chang. The network helps show where Chia‐Ming Chang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chia‐Ming Chang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chia‐Ming Chang Line = papers co-authored together Chia‐Ming Chang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 242 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003418
2 2006198
3 2007178
4 2003170
5 2003133
6 2009132
7 2012108
8 2006102
9 2005101
10
Clinical significance of potential contaminants in blood cultures among patients in a medical center.
200798
11 201992
12 201292
13 198085
14 197676
15 198964
16 201164
17 200562
18 200562
19 201561
20 200254

About Chia‐Ming Chang

Chia‐Ming Chang is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery and Molecular Medicine, having authored 242 papers that have together received 5.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (15 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (12 papers), Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (10 papers), Urinary Tract Infections Management (9 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (8 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (7 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (7 papers) and Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (691 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (164 citations), Endocrinology (391 citations), Information Systems and Management (501 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (170 citations). Chia‐Ming Chang has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Wen‐Chien Ko, Nan–Yao Lee, Shin‐Yuan Hung, Cheng‐Yuan Ku, Nai‐Ying Ko, Ching‐Chi Lee, Hsin‐I Shih, Hsin–Chun Lee, Po‐Lin Chen and Te-Jen Lai. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, BMC Geriatrics, Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact