Judith Pascoe

1.0k citations
32 papers · 694 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Judith Pascoe

26 papers receiving 410 citations

Peers

Judith Pascoe
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 227
  • Literature and Literary Theory 105
  • Museology 28
  • History 83
  • Neurology 56
Replace Sarah F. Williams with:
Sarah F. Williams United Kingdom
E. Gardner United States
Malcolm J. Proudfoot United Kingdom
Mary Gibson United States
Cornelius Borck Germany
Suzanne Chen United States
Janet M. Paterson United Kingdom
María Jesús Buxó ì Rey Spain
Scott Lowe United States
Satoko Kato Japan
Judith Pascoe relative to Sarah F. Williams United Kingdom Sarah F. Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Sarah F. Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Judith Pascoe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Judith Pascoe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Judith Pascoe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Judith Pascoe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Judith Pascoe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Judith Pascoe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Judith Pascoe. The network helps show where Judith Pascoe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Judith Pascoe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Judith Pascoe Line = papers co-authored together Judith Pascoe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1957140
2 195656
3 195454
4 200054
5 198345
6 195243
7 195439
8 200438
9 195933
10 200428
11 200520
12 198418
13
The Hummingbird Cabinet: A Rare and Curious History of Romantic Collectors
200516
14
A technique for the introduction of intracellular electrodes.
195516
15 195714
16 201114
17 199414
18
The Sarah Siddons Audio Files: Romanticism and the Lost Voice
201112
19 196511
20 19519

About Judith Pascoe

Judith Pascoe is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Literature and Literary Theory, Physiology and History, having authored 32 papers that have together received 694 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (2 papers), Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health (2 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (2 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (1 paper), American Literature and Culture (1 paper), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (1 paper) and Diverse Musicological Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (227 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (105 citations), Museology (28 citations), History (83 citations) and Neurology (56 citations). Judith Pascoe has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include G. L. Brown, G. Steg, Raǵnar Granit, Mary A. Favret, D. M. Catley, R.W. Clarke, H. McLennan, K. Diete-Spiff, Leah Price and P H Ellaway. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physiology, Studies in Romanticism, Romanticism, ˜The œEmily Dickinson journal and The Wordsworth Circle.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact