Judith Lees
Impact in
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 2%
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
-
- Pain Management and Opioid Use
Papers in
-
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes 3
- Co-authors
- Alexandre Chan (1 shared paper)A Coleman (1 shared paper)David Thorne (1 shared paper)Michael Ashby (1 shared paper)Mary Brooksbank (1 shared paper)Dianna Weikel (1 shared paper)Rajesh V. Lalla (1 shared paper)Douglas E. Peterson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Child Abuse Review (1 paper)Supportive Care in Cancer (1 paper)The Lancet Oncology (1 paper)Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (1 paper)Journal of Geriatric Oncology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Judith Lees
8 papers receiving 486 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 111
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 76
- Family Practice 25
- Otorhinolaryngology 36
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 8
Countries citing papers authored by Judith Lees
This map shows the geographic impact of Judith Lees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Judith Lees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Judith Lees more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Judith Lees
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Judith Lees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Judith Lees. The network helps show where Judith Lees may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Judith Lees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 198 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 107 | |
| 3 | 1995 | 103 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 51 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 23 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 7 | |
| 8 | Management of polypharmacy in older cancer patients | 2013 | 4 |
About Judith Lees
Judith Lees is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Family Practice, Clinical Psychology and Surgery, having authored 8 papers that have together received 514 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (3 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (2 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (1 paper), Oral health in cancer treatment (1 paper), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (1 paper), Research in Social Sciences (1 paper) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (111 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (76 citations), Family Practice (25 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (36 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (8 citations). Judith Lees has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Alexandre Chan, A Coleman, David Thorne, Michael Ashby, Mary Brooksbank, Dianna Weikel, Rajesh V. Lalla, Douglas E. Peterson, Monica Fliedner and Takehiko Mori. Their work appears in journals such as Child Abuse Review, Supportive Care in Cancer, The Lancet Oncology, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Journal of Geriatric Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.