J.-P. De Backer

765 citations
16 papers · 668 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

J.-P. De Backer

16 papers receiving 636 citations

Peers

J.-P. De Backer
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 344
  • Horticulture 12
  • Molecular Biology 410
  • Biochemistry 41
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 91
Replace William F. Dryden with:
William F. Dryden Canada
Jean‐Paul De Backer Belgium
Yukio Nishizawa Japan
M Wollemann Hungary
M T Piascik United States
Kern von Hungen United States
A. Glässer Italy
S. R. Nahorski United Kingdom
Yoshiaki Hosohata Japan
Thomas H. Burkey United States
J.-P. De Backer relative to William F. Dryden Canada William F. Dryden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
William F. Dryden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J.-P. De Backer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.-P. De Backer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.-P. De Backer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.-P. De Backer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.-P. De Backer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.-P. De Backer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.-P. De Backer. The network helps show where J.-P. De Backer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J.-P. De Backer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J.-P. De Backer Line = papers co-authored together J.-P. De Backer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1994137
2 1999135
3 199485
4 198478
5 198357
6 199744
7 199730
8 198721
9 198916
10 198115
11 199312
12 198611
13 199810
14 19978
15
The effects of candesartan on human AT1 receptor-expressing Chinese hamster ovary cells.
19995
16 20014

About J.-P. De Backer

J.-P. De Backer is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Organic Chemistry and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 668 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (12 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (2 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Assays (2 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (2 papers) and Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (344 citations), Horticulture (12 citations), Molecular Biology (410 citations), Biochemistry (41 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (91 citations). J.-P. De Backer has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Georges Vauquelin, Patrick Vanderheyden, Jacques De Keyser, Frederik Fierens, Norbert Fraeyman, Giampiero Bricca, A. Donny Strosberg, Pascal Bousquet, Carl André and Nadine Wilczak. Their work appears in journals such as Phytomedicine, The EMBO Journal, Biochemical Pharmacology, Neuroscience and Molecular Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact