Joyce Peper

1.4k citations
34 papers · 242 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Joyce Peper

24 papers receiving 241 citations

Peers

Joyce Peper
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 129
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 69
  • Emergency Medicine 24
  • Internal Medicine 8
  • Surgery 91
Replace Damon M. Kwan with:
Damon M. Kwan United States
Marion Kibler France
Sobhi Abadi Israel
Peter Hui United States
T Meijers Netherlands
Martina Pianelli Italy
Righab Hamdan Lebanon
Maria Tizzani Italy
Zachary K. Wegermann United States
Mahmoud Ismayl United States
Joyce Peper relative to Damon M. Kwan United States Damon M. Kwan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
Damon M. Kwan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joyce Peper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joyce Peper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joyce Peper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joyce Peper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joyce Peper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joyce Peper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joyce Peper. The network helps show where Joyce Peper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joyce Peper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joyce Peper Line = papers co-authored together Joyce Peper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202255
2 202238
3 202323
4 201820
5 201917
6 202213
7 202112
8 202410
9 20219
10 20208
11
Fractional Flow Reserve: Patient Selection and Perspectives
20217
12 20214
13 20214
14 20233
15 20243
16 20243
17 20243
18 20242
19 20222
20 20242

About Joyce Peper

Joyce Peper is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Internal Medicine, having authored 34 papers that have together received 242 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (11 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (8 papers), Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (7 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (4 papers), Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases (4 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (3 papers), Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments (3 papers) and Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (129 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (69 citations), Emergency Medicine (24 citations), Internal Medicine (8 citations) and Surgery (91 citations). Joyce Peper has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Martin J. Swaans, Jurriën M. ten Berg, Tim Leiner, Diederick E. Grobbee, Vincent J. Nijenhuis, Yunpeng Zhu, Sigrid Sandner, Laura M. Willemsen, Björn Redfors and Benno J. Rensing. Their work appears in journals such as European Heart Journal, European Radiology, Pulmonary Circulation, Scientific Reports and Nuclear Medicine Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact