Josh Williams

26 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Josh Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
  • Human-Computer Interaction 152
  • Applied Psychology 54
  • Social Psychology 145
  • Molecular Biology 416
  • Hepatology 42
Replace Tomoko Saito with:
Tomoko Saito Japan
Gilles J. P. Rautureau France
Atsushi Hiyama Japan
Elizabeth Clark United States
David L. Mann Netherlands
Anne R. Haake United States
Andrew J. Anderson Australia
Konstantinos Tsiakas United States
Isabelle Chemin France
Robin R. Johnson United States
Josh Williams relative to Tomoko Saito Japan Tomoko Saito's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Tomoko Saito · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Josh Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Josh Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Josh Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Josh Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Josh Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Josh Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Josh Williams. The network helps show where Josh Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Josh Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Josh Williams Line = papers co-authored together Josh Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994247
2 1995143
3 2010135
4 2011128
5 1994103
6 198874
7 201172
8 201250
9 201330
10
Human Emotional State and its Relevance for Military VR Training
200523
11 200521
12 200313
13 20109
14
The Fidelity of 'Feel': Emotional Affordance in Virtual Environments
20058
15 20127
16 20106
17
Stress resilience in virtual environments: training combat relevant emotional coping skills using virtual reality
20126
18 20074
19 20233
20 20193

About Josh Williams

Josh Williams is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction, Molecular Biology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (5 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (3 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (3 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (3 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Games (2 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (2 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (2 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (152 citations), Applied Psychology (54 citations), Social Psychology (145 citations), Molecular Biology (416 citations) and Hepatology (42 citations). Josh Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Ourania Andrisani, John N. Anderson, Peter J. Roach, Carol J. Fiol, Albert Rizzo, Todd T. Eckdahl, John Galen Buckwalter, Edward C. Bronson, Daniel J. Fitzgerald and Belinda Lange. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, International Journal on Disability and Human Development, Molecular and Cellular Biology, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B Journal of Engineering Manufacture and Optometry and Vision Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact