Josh Gardner

465 citations
14 papers · 199 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Josh Gardner

13 papers receiving 184 citations

Peers

Josh Gardner
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Computer Science Applications 121
  • Health Informatics 9
  • Safety Research 34
  • Artificial Intelligence 103
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 15
Replace Yukyeong Song with:
Yukyeong Song United States
Bita Akram United States
Sahan Bulathwela United Kingdom
Devika Sangwan India
Balqis Albreiki United Arab Emirates
Philipp Leitner Austria
Nils Knoth Germany
Vangel V. Ajanovski North Macedonia
Lucas W. Liebenow Germany
F. Jay Breyer United States
Josh Gardner relative to Yukyeong Song United States Yukyeong Song's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×17.5×
Yukyeong Song · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Josh Gardner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Josh Gardner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Josh Gardner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Josh Gardner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Josh Gardner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Josh Gardner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Josh Gardner. The network helps show where Josh Gardner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Josh Gardner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Josh Gardner Line = papers co-authored together Josh Gardner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2019118
2 201822
3 201816
4
Modeling and Experimental Design for MOOC Dropout Prediction: A Replication Perspective.
201912
5 20176
6 20196
7 20205
8 20243
9 20243
10 20072
11 20182
12
Statistical Approaches to the Model Comparison Task in Learning Analytics.
20172
13
Toward Replicable Predictive Model Evaluation in MOOCs.
20171
14 20201

About Josh Gardner

Josh Gardner is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Software, Artificial Intelligence, Computational Mathematics and Architecture, having authored 14 papers that have together received 199 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Online Learning and Analytics (8 papers), Machine Learning and Data Classification (5 papers), Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (2 papers), Software System Performance and Reliability (2 papers), Software Engineering Research (1 paper), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (1 paper) and Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (121 citations), Health Informatics (9 citations), Safety Research (34 citations), Artificial Intelligence (103 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (15 citations). Josh Gardner has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Christopher A. Brooks, Ryan S. Baker, Yuming Yang, Arya Farahi, Ludwig Schmidt, Danai Koutra, Dale Baker, Adrienne Decker, Michael Oehrtman and Brian M. McSkimming. Their work appears in journals such as Educational Data Mining and arXiv (Cornell University).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact