Joseph Stanton
Impact in
- Internal Medicine top 5%
- Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
-
- Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Papers in
-
- Themes in Literature Analysis 4
- Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies 1
- American and British Literature Analysis 1
-
- Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management 3
- Co-authors
- Robert W. Wilkins (3 shared papers)Julius Litter (1 shared paper)Charles E. Rath (1 shared paper)Frank A. Finnerty (1 shared paper)Harold W. Schnaper (1 shared paper)Edward D. Freis (1 shared paper)Robert L. Johnson (1 shared paper)Thomas J. Ryan (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- New England Journal of Medicine (3 papers)American Art (1 paper)The Lion and the unicorn (1 paper)Journal of Clinical Investigation (1 paper)World Literature Today (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesPakistan
In The Last Decade
Joseph Stanton
7 papers receiving 122 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Internal Medicine 100
- Emergency Medical Services 17
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 48
- Surgery 72
- Hematology 10
Countries citing papers authored by Joseph Stanton
This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph Stanton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph Stanton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph Stanton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph Stanton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph Stanton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph Stanton. The network helps show where Joseph Stanton may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Joseph Stanton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1952 | 78 | |
| 2 | 1953 | 50 | |
| 3 | 1951 | 30 | |
| 4 | 1964 | 7 | |
| 5 | 1990 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 8 | "Aid-in-dying": the right to die or the right to kill? -- A public forum. | 1988 | 1 |
| 9 | 1998 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2002 | 0 | |
| 11 | 1994 | 0 | |
| 12 | The Important Books: Children's Picture Books as Art and Literature | 2005 | 0 |
About Joseph Stanton
Joseph Stanton is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Internal Medicine, Surgery, Epidemiology and History, having authored 12 papers that have together received 171 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Themes in Literature Analysis (4 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (3 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (2 papers), Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (2 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (1 paper), American and British Literature Analysis (1 paper), Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases (1 paper) and Health and Conflict Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (100 citations), Emergency Medical Services (17 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (48 citations), Surgery (72 citations) and Hematology (10 citations). Joseph Stanton has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Robert W. Wilkins, Julius Litter, Charles E. Rath, Frank A. Finnerty, Harold W. Schnaper, Edward D. Freis, Robert L. Johnson, Thomas J. Ryan, Joseph P. Lynch and Derek Humphry. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, American Art, The Lion and the unicorn, Journal of Clinical Investigation and World Literature Today.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.