Joseph Patrick McFall

18 papers receiving 396 citations

Peers

Joseph Patrick McFall
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • General Decision Sciences 84
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 37
  • Clinical Psychology 141
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 63
  • Applied Psychology 17
Replace Philip G. Erwin with:
Philip G. Erwin United Kingdom
Eva Costa Martins Portugal
Haonan Quan United States
Kylie Francis Canada
Sandra Buratti Sweden
Jennelle E. Yopchick United States
Raúl Berríos Chile
Nadine Kasten Germany
Antonio Godoy Spain
Nancy C. Higgins Canada
Joseph Patrick McFall relative to Philip G. Erwin United Kingdom Philip G. Erwin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×10×
Philip G. Erwin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joseph Patrick McFall

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph Patrick McFall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph Patrick McFall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph Patrick McFall more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph Patrick McFall

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph Patrick McFall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph Patrick McFall. The network helps show where Joseph Patrick McFall may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Joseph Patrick McFall, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joseph Patrick McFall Line = papers co-authored together Joseph Patrick McFall links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2008110
2 200791
3 200655
4 200943
5 202239
6 201521
7 201818
8 200813
9 20106
10 20236
11 20155
12 20184
13 20232
14 20232
15 20242
16 20221
17 20241
18 20251
19 20260

About Joseph Patrick McFall

Joseph Patrick McFall is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 19 papers that have together received 420 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (4 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (2 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (2 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (2 papers), Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers) and Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (84 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (37 citations), Clinical Psychology (141 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (63 citations) and Applied Psychology (17 citations). Joseph Patrick McFall has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Glen I. Spielmans, JoNell Strough, Kelly L. Schuller, Clare Marie Mehta, Jon E. Grahe, MATTHEW T. SCHMOLESKY, Dana C. Leighton, William J. Chopik, Andrew Haddon Kemp and Liliana J. Lengua. Their work appears in journals such as Emerging Adulthood, Behavior Research Methods, Critical Studies on Terrorism, Journal of Policing Intelligence and Counter Terrorism and The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact