Joseph E. Grush

506 citations
23 papers · 379 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Joseph E. Grush

22 papers receiving 331 citations

Peers

Joseph E. Grush
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Applied Psychology 40
  • Social Psychology 133
  • Communication 36
  • General Decision Sciences 8
  • General Psychology 5
Replace Richard T. Santee with:
Richard T. Santee United States
Sylvester Taylor United States
Cyril J. Sadowski United States
Linda A. Reed
Richard P. McGlynn United States
Bernard Personnaz France
Paul R. Bernthal United States
Jason W. Hart United States
Frank J. Atelsek United States
Jane George‐Falvy United States
Joseph E. Grush relative to Richard T. Santee United States Richard T. Santee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Richard T. Santee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joseph E. Grush

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph E. Grush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph E. Grush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph E. Grush more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph E. Grush

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph E. Grush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph E. Grush. The network helps show where Joseph E. Grush may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Joseph E. Grush, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joseph E. Grush Line = papers co-authored together Joseph E. Grush links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197654
2 198853
3 198646
4 198636
5 197534
6 197829
7 198024
8 197324
9 197518
10 197512
11 19799
12 19738
13 19806
14
A New Self-Report Measure of Impulsivity.
19835
15 19764
16
Attitude Formation, Novel Stimuli, and Exposure Effects.
19753
17 19883
18 19833
19 19783
20 19792

About Joseph E. Grush

Joseph E. Grush is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Applied Psychology, Education and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 23 papers that have together received 379 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers), Communication in Education and Healthcare (3 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (2 papers), Media Influence and Health (2 papers) and School Choice and Performance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (40 citations), Social Psychology (133 citations), Communication (36 citations), General Decision Sciences (8 citations) and General Psychology (5 citations). Joseph E. Grush has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Frank Costin, Lynn E. Miller, Gerald L. Clore, Michael Coles, Herbert J. Rubin and Irene S. Rubin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Academy of Management Journal, Journal of Research in Personality and American Educational Research Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact