Joost Engelfriet

6.0k citations
111 papers · 2.3k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Joost Engelfriet

107 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Joost Engelfriet
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 1.9k
  • Software 234
  • Artificial Intelligence 1.5k
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 71
  • Hardware and Architecture 69
Replace Jan Willem Klop with:
Jan Willem Klop Netherlands
Janusz Brzozowski Canada
Luca Aceto Iceland
Stefan Szeider Austria
Sheila A. Greibach United States
Jeremy Gibbons United Kingdom
Ross M. McConnell United States
Wan Fokkink Netherlands
Agostino Dovier Italy
Alan C. H. Ling United States
Joost Engelfriet relative to Jan Willem Klop Netherlands Jan Willem Klop's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.9×
Jan Willem Klop · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joost Engelfriet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joost Engelfriet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joost Engelfriet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joost Engelfriet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joost Engelfriet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joost Engelfriet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joost Engelfriet. The network helps show where Joost Engelfriet may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joost Engelfriet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joost Engelfriet Line = papers co-authored together Joost Engelfriet links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 111 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993172
2 1975163
3 1991144
4 198599
5 198088
6 197686
7 201271
8 197771
9 200165
10 197863
11 197557
12 198143
13 198042
14 198634
15 200033
16 200332
17 199532
18 198130
19 200629
20 198229

About Joost Engelfriet

Joost Engelfriet is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology, Software and Information Systems, having authored 111 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include semigroups and automata theory (76 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (38 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (34 papers), Algorithms and Data Compression (33 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (26 papers), DNA and Biological Computing (26 papers), Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (16 papers) and Advanced Algebra and Logic (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (1.9k citations), Software (234 citations), Artificial Intelligence (1.5k citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (71 citations) and Hardware and Architecture (69 citations). Joost Engelfriet has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Grzegorz Rozenberg, Heiko Vogler, Bruno Courcelle, Erik M. Schmidt, Hendrik Jan Hoogeboom, Sebastian Maneth, Giora Slutzki, Roderick Bloem, Gilberto Filé and Vincent van Oostrom. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Computer and System Sciences, Acta Informatica, Theoretical Computer Science, Information and Computation and Theory of Computing Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact