Jonathan Tsang

1.5k citations
15 papers · 306 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

    • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment 6
    • Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology 1

Jonathan Tsang

13 papers receiving 291 citations

Peers

Jonathan Tsang
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Management Science and Operations Research 58
  • Genetics 49
  • Cancer Research 64
  • Biomaterials 30
  • Molecular Biology 138
Replace EF Petricoin with:
EF Petricoin United States
Inderjit Daphu Norway
Junko Okabe Japan
Molly Morgan United States
Neil Gray United Kingdom
Elizabeth Blackwood United States
Jessica C. Walrath United States
Gangga Anuraga Indonesia
Swapnil Potdar Finland
Jonathan Tsang relative to EF Petricoin United States EF Petricoin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
EF Petricoin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Tsang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Tsang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Tsang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Tsang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Tsang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Tsang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Tsang. The network helps show where Jonathan Tsang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Tsang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Tsang Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Tsang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 201784
2 200661
3 200740
4 197529
5 202124
6 202023
7 201418
8 201813
9 20226
10 20232
11 20172
12 20212
13 20051
14 20191
15 20240

About Jonathan Tsang

Jonathan Tsang is a scholar working on Genetics, Oncology, Molecular Biology, Cancer Research and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 15 papers that have together received 306 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Polymer Surface Interaction Studies (2 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (2 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (2 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (1 paper), Protein Degradation and Inhibitors (1 paper), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (1 paper) and Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (58 citations), Genetics (49 citations), Cancer Research (64 citations), Biomaterials (30 citations) and Molecular Biology (138 citations). Jonathan Tsang has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include David A. Nathanson, Timothy F. Cloughesy, Gregory M. Harbers, Kevin E. Healy, Shyam Patel, Song Li, Costante Ceccarini, Kai S. Koong, P.C.K. Kwok and Peter M. Clark. Their work appears in journals such as Neuro-Oncology, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Chemical Science, ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters and Nature Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact