Jonathan Smith

24 papers receiving 301 citations

Peers

Jonathan Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 15
  • Modeling and Simulation 14
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 38
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 73
  • Neurology 37
Replace Mohammad Amin Salehi with:
Mohammad Amin Salehi Iran
G. E. Antonio Hong Kong
Otávio Gomes Lins Brazil
Xavier Alacoque France
Claudio Buccelli Italy
Seong Woo Kim South Korea
Elena Cecilia Roşca Romania
Christof Kolb Germany
P. Dudouet France
Stefan Ehehalt Germany
Jonathan Smith relative to Mohammad Amin Salehi Iran Mohammad Amin Salehi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Mohammad Amin Salehi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Smith. The network helps show where Jonathan Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Smith Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199681
2 201142
3 202037
4 200327
5 201222
6 201520
7 201914
8 196113
9 200412
10 202111
11 20209
12 20245
13 20065
14 20074
15 20244
16 20172
17 20162
18 20242
19 20232
20 20092

About Jonathan Smith

Jonathan Smith is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Computational Mechanics, Aerospace Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Surgery, having authored 27 papers that have together received 321 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migraine and Headache Studies (8 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (4 papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (4 papers), Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research (3 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (3 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (2 papers), Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (2 papers) and Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (15 citations), Modeling and Simulation (14 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (38 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (73 citations) and Neurology (37 citations). Jonathan Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Robert G. Newcombe, Richard Walker, Brian Harris, Lisetta Lovett, Graham Read, F. Michael Cutrer, Fabrizio De Rita, Richard Kirk, Anders Karlsson and Sophie Hu. Their work appears in journals such as Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain, Pediatric Transplantation, Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and The British Journal of Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact