Benjamin Fine

40 papers receiving 797 citations

Peers

Benjamin Fine
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Health Informatics 111
  • Biomaterials 156
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 11
  • Health Information Management 33
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 24
Replace Mark Michalski with:
Mark Michalski United States
Naveen Jeyaraman India
Katy Blumer United States
Shigao Huang China
Luke Gompels United Kingdom
P. Chłosta Poland
Juan M. Durán Spain
Elsie Ross United States
Jayne Seekins United States
Stephen Gilbert Germany
Benjamin Fine relative to Mark Michalski United States Mark Michalski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Mark Michalski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Fine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Fine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Fine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Fine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Fine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Fine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Fine. The network helps show where Benjamin Fine may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Fine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin Fine Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin Fine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006225
2 2009109
3 201776
4 202066
5 202441
6 202236
7 202036
8 201929
9 202316
10
Underachievers : how they can be helped
196716
11 200616
12 198814
13 201714
14 198813
15
Imaging appropriateness criteria: why Canadian family physicians should care.
201413
16 202212
17 202312
18 199410
19 20229
20 19759

About Benjamin Fine

Benjamin Fine is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Artificial Intelligence, Health Informatics, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 43 papers that have together received 836 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (6 papers), Finite Group Theory Research (4 papers), Geometric and Algebraic Topology (4 papers), graph theory and CDMA systems (4 papers), Radiology practices and education (3 papers), Machine Learning in Healthcare (3 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (3 papers) and COVID-19 diagnosis using AI (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (111 citations), Biomaterials (156 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (11 citations), Health Information Management (33 citations) and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (24 citations). Benjamin Fine has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include A. Patel, Kibret Mequanint, Martin Sandig, Brian Golden, Dante Morra, Joshua Reicher, Mohamed Abdalla, David J. Stone, Leo Anthony Celi and Charles Frohman. Their work appears in journals such as CMAJ Open, Radiology Artificial Intelligence, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Canadian Journal of Mathematics and Canadian Medical Association Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact