Jonathan Roberge
Impact in
- Safety Research top 5%
- Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Urban Studies top 5%
- Cultural Industries and Urban Development
Papers in
-
- Education, sociology, and vocational training 4
- Canadian Identity and History 3
- Consumer behavior in food and health 3
-
- Ethics and Social Impacts of AI 8
- Co-authors
- Robert Seyfert (5 shared papers)Fenwick McKelvey (3 shared papers)Kevin A. Morin (1 shared paper)Danilo Martuccelli (1 shared paper)Luke Stark (1 shared paper)Joanna Redden (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Jonathan Roberge
35 papers receiving 250 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Safety Research 76
- Urban Studies 35
- Communication 33
- General Social Sciences 13
- Sociology and Political Science 122
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Roberge
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Roberge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Roberge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Roberge more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Roberge
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Roberge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Roberge. The network helps show where Jonathan Roberge may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Roberge, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 46 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 34 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 21 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 19 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 19 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2002 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2016 | 3 |
About Jonathan Roberge
Jonathan Roberge is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research, Urban Studies, Philosophy and Communication, having authored 39 papers that have together received 293 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (8 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (5 papers), Education, sociology, and vocational training (4 papers), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (3 papers), Canadian Identity and History (3 papers), Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts (3 papers), Consumer behavior in food and health (3 papers) and Social Media and Politics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (76 citations), Urban Studies (35 citations), Communication (33 citations), General Social Sciences (13 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (122 citations). Jonathan Roberge has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include Robert Seyfert, Fenwick McKelvey, Kevin A. Morin, Danilo Martuccelli, Luke Stark and Joanna Redden. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Arts Management Law and Society, Big Data & Society, Thesis Eleven, AI & Society and Social Semiotics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.