Jonathan Peter Hill

20 papers receiving 452 citations

Peers

Jonathan Peter Hill
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Health 105
  • History and Philosophy of Science 57
  • Sociology and Political Science 245
  • Religious studies 38
  • Education 80
Replace Jeff Astley with:
Jeff Astley United Kingdom
Jeffrey Guhin United States
Marta Trzebiatowska United Kingdom
Solon J. Simmons United States
Hanan A. Alexander Israel
John A. Schmalzbauer United States
Tim Clydesdale United States
Handel Kashope Wright Canada
Shannon M. Calderone United States
Albert Leland Jamison
Jonathan Peter Hill relative to Jeff Astley United Kingdom Jeff Astley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7×
Jeff Astley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Peter Hill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Peter Hill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Peter Hill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Peter Hill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Peter Hill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Peter Hill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Peter Hill. The network helps show where Jonathan Peter Hill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Peter Hill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Peter Hill Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Peter Hill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201192
2 200971
3 201469
4 201351
5 201139
6 200932
7 201326
8
Toward the Measurement of Interpersonal Generosity (IG): An IG Scale Conceptualized, Tested, and Validated
200923
9 201123
10 201516
11 201414
12 201710
13 20119
14 20183
15 20193
16 20132
17 20232
18 20071
19 20121
20 20171

About Jonathan Peter Hill

Jonathan Peter Hill is a scholar working on Health, Sociology and Political Science, Education, History and Philosophy of Science and Philosophy, having authored 22 papers that have together received 488 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (10 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (5 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (4 papers), Evolution and Science Education (3 papers), Religious Education and Schools (3 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (3 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers) and Education, Philosophy, and Society (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (105 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (57 citations), Sociology and Political Science (245 citations), Religious studies (38 citations) and Education (80 citations). Jonathan Peter Hill has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Brandon Vaidyanathan, Daniel V. A. Olson, Christian S. Smith, Christian Michael Smith, Perry L. Glanzer, Jeremy E. Uecker, Byron R. Johnson, Keith J. Edwards, Todd W. Hall and Joseph O. Baker. Their work appears in journals such as Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Journal of Beliefs and Values, Sociology of Religion, Journal of Contemporary Religion and Youth & Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact