Jonathan Penm

131 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Jonathan Penm
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 322
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 90
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 118
  • Family Practice 31
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 430
Replace Vibhu Paudyal with:
Vibhu Paudyal United Kingdom
Antje Neubert Germany
Kerry Wilbur Qatar
Lisa Dolovich Canada
Ellen Schafheutle United Kingdom
Betty Chaar Australia
Jean‐François Bussières Canada
Marc Afilalo Canada
Neil J. MacKinnon Canada
Lisa Pont Australia
Jonathan Penm relative to Vibhu Paudyal United Kingdom Vibhu Paudyal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Vibhu Paudyal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Penm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Penm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Penm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Penm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Penm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Penm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Penm. The network helps show where Jonathan Penm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Penm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Penm Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Penm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 141 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019138
2 2013119
3 202098
4 201871
5 201760
6 201456
7 201949
8 202044
9 201741
10 201840
11 201334
12 202233
13 201632
14 202032
15 201730
16 202129
17 202328
18 201828
19 201924
20 202124

About Jonathan Penm

Jonathan Penm is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Surgery and General Health Professions, having authored 141 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (37 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (31 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (18 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (11 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (7 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (7 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (7 papers) and Antibiotic Use and Resistance (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (322 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (90 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (118 citations), Family Practice (31 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (430 citations). Jonathan Penm has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Betty Chaar, Rebekah Moles, Asad E. Patanwala, Neil J. MacKinnon, Sujita W. Narayan, Lachlan Oldfield, Erin L. Winstanley, Danijela Gnjidic, Ana L. Hincapie and Yan Li. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research, American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Canadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada and Anaesthesia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact