Jonathan Paul

69 papers receiving 2k citations

Peers

Jonathan Paul
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Internal Medicine 85
  • Genetics 151
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 496
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 248
  • Emergency Medicine 80
Replace Kenji Okada with:
Kenji Okada Japan
Rajabrata Sarkar United States
Leonard B. Bell United States
Vedat O. Yildiz United States
John Blebea United States
Eugene P. Ceppa United States
Hideo Adachi Japan
Michael Fritzenwanger Germany
Oz M. Shapira United States
Michael S. Lee United States
Jonathan Paul relative to Kenji Okada Japan Kenji Okada's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.5×
Kenji Okada · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Paul

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Paul's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Paul with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Paul more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Paul

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Paul. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Paul. The network helps show where Jonathan Paul may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Paul, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Paul Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Paul links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 73 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000332
2 2004206
3 2005177
4 2010162
5 2012155
6 2018122
7 2013102
8 201291
9 202372
10 201357
11 201354
12 201954
13 200753
14 201934
15 201729
16 201725
17 202325
18
Clinical and economic effectiveness of percutaneous ventricular assist devices for high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
201522
19 202122
20 201921

About Jonathan Paul

Jonathan Paul is a scholar working on Internal Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Surgery, having authored 73 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (18 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (10 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (7 papers), Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (6 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (5 papers), Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (5 papers), Cardiac tumors and thrombi (4 papers) and Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (85 citations), Genetics (151 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (496 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (248 citations) and Emergency Medicine (80 citations). Jonathan Paul has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Atman Prabodh Shah, Sandeep Nathan, Péter T. Tóth, Richard O. Cannon, Tiffany M Powell, Jonathan Michael Hill, Lin Hua Piao, Stephen L. Archer, John E. Blair and Hanh M. Khuu. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, JAMA, Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, ˜The œJournal of invasive cardiology and JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact