Jonathan Newby
Impact in
-
- Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Papers in
-
- Cassava research and cyanide 11
- Nematode management and characterization studies 4
-
- Agricultural Innovations and Practices 5
- Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development 5
- Co-authors
- Rob Cramb (10 shared papers)Erik Delaquis (6 shared papers)Sean McNamara (1 shared paper)Stef de Haan (4 shared papers)Iv Phirun (2 shared papers)Kris A. G. Wyckhuys (2 shared papers)Nami Minato (3 shared papers)Dharani Dhar Burra (2 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Jonathan Newby
32 papers receiving 407 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 119
- Horticulture 10
- Forestry 26
- Soil Science 51
- Plant Science 173
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Newby
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Newby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Newby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Newby more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Newby
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Newby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Newby. The network helps show where Jonathan Newby may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Newby, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 60 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 55 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 42 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 39 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 36 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 26 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 19 | |
| 9 | Trajectories of rice-based farming systems in mainland Southeast Asia | 2015 | 16 |
| 10 | 2015 | 16 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 11 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2012 | 3 |
About Jonathan Newby
Jonathan Newby is a scholar working on Plant Science, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Soil Science, having authored 33 papers that have together received 421 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cassava research and cyanide (11 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (7 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (5 papers), Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (5 papers), Cambodian History and Society (4 papers), Nematode management and characterization studies (4 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (4 papers) and Agricultural Systems and Practices (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (119 citations), Horticulture (10 citations), Forestry (26 citations), Soil Science (51 citations) and Plant Science (173 citations). Jonathan Newby has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Vietnam and Colombia. Frequent co-authors include Rob Cramb, Erik Delaquis, Sean McNamara, Stef de Haan, Iv Phirun, Kris A. G. Wyckhuys, Nami Minato, Dharani Dhar Burra, Wilmer J. Cuéllar and Songbi Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Agricultural Systems, Food Security, Agronomy and Small-scale Forestry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.