Jonathan McFadden

20 papers receiving 397 citations

Peers

Jonathan McFadden
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Marketing 84
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52
  • Plant Science 176
  • Soil Science 37
  • Food Science 68
Replace Hsiaoping Chien with:
Hsiaoping Chien Japan
Henry An Canada
Elizabeth Canales United States
Lorenz Probst Austria
Jürn Sanders Germany
Shehu Folaranmi Gbolahan Yusuf South Africa
Corinne E. Alexander United States
Toritseju Begho United Kingdom
Brian P. Baker United States
Robin G. Brumfield United States
Jonathan McFadden relative to Hsiaoping Chien Japan Hsiaoping Chien's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Hsiaoping Chien · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan McFadden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan McFadden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan McFadden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan McFadden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan McFadden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan McFadden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan McFadden. The network helps show where Jonathan McFadden may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan McFadden, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan McFadden Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan McFadden links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017148
2 201747
3 202145
4 201834
5 202125
6 201917
7 201717
8 201911
9 201611
10 201710
11 20239
12 20178
13 20175
14
Climate Change: Challenge and Opportunity to Maintain Sustainable Productivity Growth and Environment in a Corn-Soybean Bioeconomy
20173
15 20192
16 20222
17 20212
18 20192
19 20182
20 20172

About Jonathan McFadden

Jonathan McFadden is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Economics and Econometrics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Plant Science and Soil Science, having authored 21 papers that have together received 402 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic and Environmental Valuation (4 papers), Agricultural Economics and Policy (4 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (3 papers), Agricultural risk and resilience (2 papers), Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (2 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (2 papers), Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (2 papers) and Organic Food and Agriculture (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (84 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (52 citations), Plant Science (176 citations), Soil Science (37 citations) and Food Science (68 citations). Jonathan McFadden has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Wallace E. Huffman, Frank Errickson, Seth James Wechsler, Steven Wallander, John Miranowski, Robert Hoppe, David J. Smith, Maria Bowman, Roger Claassen and David Smith. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Food Policy, Social Choice and Welfare, Pest Management Science and BioEnergy Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact