Jonathan Matheny

704 citations
7 papers · 438 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Matheny

6 papers receiving 378 citations

Peers

Jonathan Matheny
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 163
  • Applied Psychology 32
  • Social Psychology 132
  • Clinical Psychology 95
  • General Health Professions 108
Replace Mark Le Fevre with:
Mark Le Fevre New Zealand
Gintare Visockaite United Kingdom
Antonia J. Kaluza Germany
Gina Görgens‐Ekermans South Africa
Enrico Perinelli Italy
Renate Rau Germany
Damiano Girardi Italy
Sara Tement Slovenia
M. Pilar Berrios Martos Spain
José María Augusto Landa Spain
Jonathan Matheny relative to Mark Le Fevre New Zealand Mark Le Fevre's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Mark Le Fevre · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Matheny

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Matheny's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Matheny with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Matheny more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Matheny

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Matheny. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Matheny. The network helps show where Jonathan Matheny may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Matheny, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Matheny Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Matheny links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown

About Jonathan Matheny

Jonathan Matheny is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Social Psychology and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 438 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (2 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (2 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper), Social Power and Status Dynamics (1 paper), Emotional Intelligence and Performance (1 paper), Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy (1 paper) and Public Policy and Administration Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (163 citations), Applied Psychology (32 citations), Social Psychology (132 citations), Clinical Psychology (95 citations) and General Health Professions (108 citations). Jonathan Matheny has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Gregory S. Kolt, Mark Le Fevre, Roy K. Smollan, Janet Sayers, Margaret Brunton, John D. DesJardins and Taufiquar Khan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Managerial Psychology, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Time & Society and Tuwhera (Auckland University of Technology).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact