Jonathan Leech

717 citations
33 papers · 419 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Leech

29 papers receiving 382 citations

Peers

Jonathan Leech
Comparison fields: 5 of 17
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 380
  • Algebra and Number Theory 89
  • Management Science and Operations Research 127
  • Geometry and Topology 81
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 17
Replace Igor Dolinka with:
Igor Dolinka Serbia
Sydney Bulman‐Fleming Canada
Mati Kilp Estonia
M. E. Adams United States
Karl Auinger Austria
E. Fried Hungary
J. A. Gerhard Canada
J. Sichler Canada
Edmond W. H. Lee United States
N. Ya. Medvedev Russia
Jonathan Leech relative to Igor Dolinka Serbia Igor Dolinka's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Igor Dolinka · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Leech

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Leech's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Leech with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Leech more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Leech

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Leech. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Leech. The network helps show where Jonathan Leech may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Leech, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Leech Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Leech links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198955
2 199540
3 199636
4 199035
5 199834
6 199232
7 199524
8 198721
9 199318
10 201017
11 197510
12 19939
13 20129
14 19758
15 19988
16 20087
17 20136
18 20076
19 19826
20 20126

About Jonathan Leech

Jonathan Leech is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Algebra and Number Theory, Management Science and Operations Research, Artificial Intelligence and Mathematical Physics, having authored 33 papers that have together received 419 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Algebra and Logic (22 papers), semigroups and automata theory (12 papers), Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic (10 papers), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (9 papers), Fuzzy and Soft Set Theory (9 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (3 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (3 papers) and Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (380 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (89 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (127 citations), Geometry and Topology (81 citations) and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (17 citations). Jonathan Leech has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Slovenia and Italy. Frequent co-authors include D. G. FitzGerald and Michael Kinyon. Their work appears in journals such as Semigroup Forum, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society, Journal of Applied Logic and Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact