Jonathan Iwry

8 papers receiving 282 citations

Jonathan Iwry's Hit Papers

Closed- and open-vocabulary approaches to text analysis: A review, quantitative comparison, and recommendations. 2021 · 82 citations
820+1+3Years since publication255075

Peers

Jonathan Iwry
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Literature and Literary Theory 66
  • Applied Psychology 26
  • Clinical Psychology 102
  • Social Psychology 88
  • Human-Computer Interaction 20
Replace Aslı Enez Darçın with:
Aslı Enez Darçın Türkiye
Serdar Nurmedov Türkiye
Pino Cutrone Japan
Anson E. Long United States
Ana Levordashka United Kingdom
Narine S. Yegiyan United States
Georg Hosoya Germany
Siegfried Schumann Germany
Nangyeon Lim South Korea
Xiaoli Ni China
Jonathan Iwry relative to Aslı Enez Darçın Türkiye Aslı Enez Darçın's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Aslı Enez Darçın · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Iwry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Iwry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Iwry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Iwry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Iwry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Iwry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Iwry. The network helps show where Jonathan Iwry may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Iwry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Iwry Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Iwry links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2016130
2
Closed- and open-vocabulary approaches to text analysis: A review, quantitative comparison, and recommendations.
Hit paper breakdown →
202182
3 201671
4 201712
5 20212
6 20192
7 20172
8 20221

About Jonathan Iwry

Jonathan Iwry is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Health, having authored 8 papers that have together received 302 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (2 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (1 paper), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (1 paper), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (1 paper) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (66 citations), Applied Psychology (26 citations), Clinical Psychology (102 citations), Social Psychology (88 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (20 citations). Jonathan Iwry has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and China. Frequent co-authors include David B. Yaden, Johannes C. Eichstaedt, Andrew B. Newberg, Yukun Zhao, George E. Vaillant, Kelley J. Slack, Margaret L. Kern, Alexander Belser, Khoa D. Le Nguyen and Mary Ellen Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Methods, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Journal of Humanistic Psychology, Negotiation Journal and Psychology of Consciousness Theory Research and Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact