Jonathan Iwry

550 citations
8 papers · 353 · 1 hit paper · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Iwry

8 papers receiving 324 citations

Jonathan Iwry's Hit Papers

Closed- and open-vocabulary approaches to text analysis: A review, quantitative comparison, and recommendations. 2021 · 91 citations
910+1+3Years since publication255075

Peers

Jonathan Iwry
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Literature and Literary Theory 74
  • Clinical Psychology 111
  • Applied Psychology 26
  • Social Psychology 95
  • Human-Computer Interaction 22
Replace Xiaoli Ni with:
Xiaoli Ni China
Pino Cutrone Japan
Elisa C Baek United States
Angela L. Carey United States
Kirill Fayn Australia
Onat Yılmaz Türkiye
Serdar Nurmedov Türkiye
Aslı Enez Darçın Türkiye
Georg Hosoya Germany
Beatrix Lábadi Hungary
Jonathan Iwry relative to Xiaoli Ni China Xiaoli Ni's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Xiaoli Ni · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Iwry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Iwry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Iwry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Iwry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Iwry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Iwry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Iwry. The network helps show where Jonathan Iwry may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Iwry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Iwry Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Iwry links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2016157
2
Closed- and open-vocabulary approaches to text analysis: A review, quantitative comparison, and recommendations.
Hit paper breakdown →
202191
3 201685
4 201713
5 20172
6 20212
7 20192
8 20221

About Jonathan Iwry

Jonathan Iwry is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Health, having authored 8 papers that have together received 353 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (2 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Computational and Text Analysis Methods (1 paper), Neurological disorders and treatments (1 paper), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (74 citations), Clinical Psychology (111 citations), Applied Psychology (26 citations), Social Psychology (95 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (22 citations). Jonathan Iwry has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Japan. Frequent co-authors include David B. Yaden, Johannes C. Eichstaedt, Andrew B. Newberg, Yukun Zhao, George E. Vaillant, Kelley J. Slack, Margaret L. Kern, Mary Ellen Smith, Alexander Belser and Khoa D. Le Nguyen. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Psychological Methods, Journal of Humanistic Psychology, Negotiation Journal and Psychology of Consciousness Theory Research and Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact