Jonathan Harper
Impact in
-
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
-
- Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Papers in
-
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics 10
-
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 6
- Relativity and Gravitational Theory 1
- Co-authors
- Tadashi Takayanagi (6 shared papers)Ali Mollabashi (3 shared papers)Yusuke Taki (1 shared paper)Matthew Headrick (1 shared paper)Brian Swingle (1 shared paper)ChunJun Cao (1 shared paper)Stefano Antonini (1 shared paper)Gregory S. Bentsen (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of High Energy Physics (5 papers)Physical review. D (2 papers)Physical Review Letters (2 papers)Physical Review Research (1 paper)SciPost Physics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited StatesSpain
In The Last Decade
Jonathan Harper
12 papers receiving 293 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 217
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 120
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 158
- Computational Mathematics 2
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 92
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Harper
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Harper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Harper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Harper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Harper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Harper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Harper. The network helps show where Jonathan Harper may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Harper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 100 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 84 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 29 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 27 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2025 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2025 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2026 | 1 |
About Jonathan Harper
Jonathan Harper is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Geometry and Topology and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 12 papers that have together received 301 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (10 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (6 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (5 papers), Quantum many-body systems (2 papers), Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect (1 paper), Advanced Mathematical Physics Problems (1 paper), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (1 paper) and Advanced Topology and Set Theory (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (217 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (120 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (158 citations), Computational Mathematics (2 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (92 citations). Jonathan Harper has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Tadashi Takayanagi, Ali Mollabashi, Yusuke Taki, Yusuke Taki, Matthew Headrick, Brian Swingle, ChunJun Cao, Stefano Antonini, Gregory S. Bentsen and Shao-Kai Jian. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of High Energy Physics, Physical review. D, Physical Review Letters, Physical Review Research and SciPost Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.