Jonathan Gorman

542 citations
21 papers · 44 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Gorman

18 papers receiving 40 citations

Peers

Jonathan Gorman
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • History 17
  • History and Philosophy of Science 6
  • Horticulture 1
  • Philosophy 10
  • Library and Information Sciences 1
Replace Algernon Charles Swinburne with:
Algernon Charles Swinburne
Mark Goble United States
Frances Fanny Burney
A. Seth Pringle-Pattison
Alan Rawes United Kingdom
Israel Zangwill
Adam Smith
Henry Thomas Buckle
Francis Fry Wayland
T. Atkinson Jenkins United Kingdom
Jonathan Gorman relative to Algernon Charles Swinburne Algernon Charles Swinburne's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
Algernon Charles Swinburne · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Gorman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Gorman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Gorman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Gorman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Gorman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Gorman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Gorman. The network helps show where Jonathan Gorman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Gorman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Gorman Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Gorman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 20049
2 20236
3 20135
4 20074
5 20033
6 20072
7
Historical Judgement: The Limits of Historiographical Choice
20072
8 20112
9
The presuppositions of writing the history of historiography
20111
10
KNOWLES, D.-Political Philosophy
20031
11 20131
12 20111
13 20211
14 20181
15 20031
16 19921
17 20041
18 20141
19 20091
20 20160

About Jonathan Gorman

Jonathan Gorman is a scholar working on History, History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations and Law, having authored 21 papers that have together received 44 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy, History, and Historiography (8 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (2 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (1 paper), Forest Management and Policy (1 paper), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (1 paper) and Historical Philosophy and Science (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (17 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (6 citations), Horticulture (1 citation), Philosophy (10 citations) and Library and Information Sciences (1 citation). Jonathan Gorman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Till Neeff and Sharon L. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as History and Theory, Journal of the Philosophy of History, Rethinking History, Intellectual History Review and European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact